[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Voting: repotag for EPEL

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:25:29PM -0600, Bernard Johnson wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >   
> >>> No, don't put the blame on me (or the FPC or the future), it's your
> >>> vote.
> >>>       
> >> You started it and you have to support it if you want people to vote.
> >>     
> >
> > No, I didn't start it, it was brought up here by (another) 3rd party
> > repo manager. I just recorded the need for voting on it and did my
> > part of voting.
> >   
> I don't think thl is being unreasonable here.  *Someone* has to support
> it.  If you consider it to be a big enough issue to warrant a vote, then
> you should support it.
> There is not nearly enough bandwidth in the group to go out and "look"
> for issues.  If a 3rd party repo manager has a strong opinion on
> repotag, then he should be here supporting his views.

That already happened a month ago and generated lots of discussion on
this list: 22% of this list's traffic ever is about that! And just for
fun with stats: 21% of the traffic was about banning
fedora-usermgr. It is really beaten to death and beyond.

Please check the archives if you weren't subscribed back then.

> In lieu of that, if you are wanting a vote, then it should be you.

If I were really a proxy introducing a 3rd party's vote proposal that
the 3rd party couldn't/wouldn't represent itself I would agree, but
the situation is that there *was* already a loadful of discussion
initiated by that person and discussed with that person, only that we
didn't have someone to do the actual decision. Now that we finally
have a decisive EPEL it needs to finish the open issues, not rehash
them for the umpteenth time.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp3eKIVhxpaE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]