Voting: repotag for EPEL

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:49:26PM -0600, Bernard Johnson wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > Anyway the need to vote on that is undisputed, alone the magnitude of
> > list space these topics consume require an official EPEL stand-up. And
> > if you feel like there should be more information in the wiki or
> > elsewhere, since you read all mails, maybe you could volunteer to do
> > "that small task" and make Thorsten happy.
> >
> > FWIW "I don't want to be that guy".
> >   
> 
> I'm not trying to push you into being something that you don't want. 
> You just seem to be the biggest proponent if the idea, today.
> 
> If it's put up for a vote and not well represented, it will be a
> disservice to those who do want it to happen.
> 
> And if needed, I can do "that small task", however, it will be as an
> opponent to repotag, so we would still need a proponent.  Frankly, I
> don't see a big benefit, so I'm not the best person to write it :)

Gosh, contrary to my vanishing sanity I succumb, and I fed the votings
with some notes, I even did some research with my FPC hat on on what
the best implementation would be and added that as a note, too. Which
since it was just *my* FPC hat is just a suggestion about how the FPC
may attack this, it is neither part of the EPEL voting, nor a
guarantee that the FPC will do so. There may be even smarter and
better implementations.

Happy Easter.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20070406/996fe008/attachment.sig>