[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Complete RHEL package lists?



On 8/21/07, Dag Wieers <dag wieers com> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > On 8/21/07, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke gmail com> wrote:
> > > On 8/21/07, Karsten Wade <kwade redhat com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 15:05 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, that just amplifies the point that the information requested below seems
> > > > > to be critical prerequisite for inclusion of *any* package in EPEL.  Steering
> > > > > committee, please process this request with high priority.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Is there a complete list of all binary packages included in all RHEL
> > > > > > > channels that EPEL should be compatible with available somewhere?
> > > > > > > Complete public binary repodatas (just the metadata, not packages) of
> > > > > > > binary packages included in them would be nice.
> > > >
> > > > There are a lot of people here with knowledge of how Red Hat works.
> > > >
> > > > Is there an impediment to getting that list?
> > >
> > > Can someone detail out what information is being looked for?  Also,
> > > what channels in RHN would some of this stuff fall under.  I think
> > > that tomcat and lots o' other java stuff is in some developer
> > > channels.  We'll need to iron the whole thing out.
> >
> > Well there is the "Extras" which contains non-FLOSS code and some
> > kernel modules that arent in the main-line I think. The only other
> > stuff that would be not on CentOS-4/5 that is on RHN would be the RHX
> > channels.
>
> I think there's more than just RHX/Extras. Everything that is in RHN and
> that is not available from ftp.redhat.com in RPM or SRPM format. There are
> beta-channels that are not offered as SRPM afaik.
>
> But it's hard to list things that you don't know exist :) Someone with
> full RHN access could simply verify for himself.
>
> Also, it would be useful to have everything that cannot be distributed
> available in nosrc format as well.
>
> Kind regards,
> --   dag wieers,  dag wieers com,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
> [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>
>
I'll check my RHN account tomorrow.  We have many channels, not sure
if it's all of them or not. I will start making a list and post here.

stahnma


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]