resolution for python-imaging in EPEL
Joel Andres Granados
jgranado at redhat.com
Tue Jul 17 14:51:35 UTC 2007
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:15:38 -0400
> "Konstantin Ryabitsev" <icon at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>
>> The situation may be different for those who paid full enterprise
>> price for RHEL entitlements, but that doesn't change the fact that
>> unless EPEL provides "client" packages, I'll be left with broken
>> repositories. I will note, that it makes that much harder for me to
>> justify paying money to RH if I can have a better service using
>> Centos+EPEL.
>>
>
> Yes I know, and this is the exact problem I yelled at our RHEL pm about
> months ago, as well as other EPEL heads at the time. I forewarned that
> this was a problem that needed to be solved, and nobody listened.
>
> I'll dig more on my side of things to find out the scoop of what all
> 5Server should have access to via RHN.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>
As I understand it, If the main channel or child channels don't have the
package a new channel must be acquired.
I'll ask around the office.
--
Joel Andres Granados
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list