[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: (draft) announcement

On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 17:09 -0500, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> >
> Somewhere I think we want to touch on the quality of the packages from
> Fedora.  I think that is a big selling point.  Granted, not all
> packages are perfect, but as a RHEL subscriber, my company thinks
> highly of RHEL and how it is built, and thus like the way Fedora (at
> least the former Core) was built.  Somehow, that should be captured
> int eh announment, methinks.
> I am also hesitant to use the Perl message because LOTS of perl stuff
> still isn't in EPEL.  (/me rebuilt several modules last week for
> RHEL).

Good points; I'll replace the Perl stuff with stuff about package
quality, Fedora => RHEL, etc.

- Karsten 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]