[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rpms that just need a rebuild...



Remi Collet wrote:
Greg Swallow a écrit :
of Fedora Extras 6 packages.  For instance I need ~15 php-pear-??? rpms
for EL5 that I just rebuilt from the Fedora Extras 6 sources - no
modifications to the spec files needed.

I'm probably the maintener of some of them and i will like to push them
on EPEL soon... (i need some time to prepare my build machine for my tests).

Some of them are really useful (i think) because they were provided by
old php version (bundle with), so EL4 -> EL5 mays requires then.

Yes, I actually reported that as a bug in RHEL5 but was told to read the release notes - list of the missing ones in this bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218220

Christopher Stone (maintener for most of the others) haven't put his
status on http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatus.

Actually i'm waiting for a "green light" to begin the push...

Sounds good. So just curious, what will be your philosophy in updating the EL5 rpms vs say the FC6 rpms? Do you think you will just rebuild the same versions at the same time? Or maybe update the FC6 rpm a week/month before the EL5 rpm (assuming the update is new features, not security)?

Greg


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]