[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: EPEL acceptance policy



On 12.03.2007 21:36, Tim Burke wrote:
> [...] 
> Tying to think of an alternative recommended wording:
> 
> "thus packages from EPEL should never replace packages delivered by Red 
> Hat - including those on the base distribution as well as layered products."

I'm fine with that mostly, but I have one big problem: I (and other
probably as well) might simply don't know what "layered products
from RH which are delivered separately from the OS" exists at all.

CU
thl


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]