[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Rebuild for RHEL5 final



Dennis Gilmore wrote :

> On Tuesday 27 March 2007 10:23:43 am Matthias Saou wrote:
> > Michael E Brown wrote :
> > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 09:17:09AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > > >Hi all!
> > > > >
> > > > >Now that I've thought about it some more I don't like that plan that
> > > > >much anymore, as then it's not possible to differentiate if people
> > > > > have the old or the new package installed. Sure, that shouldn't be
> > > > > many people yet, but nevertheless it could create problems.
> > > > >
> > > > >Opinions? Just ignore that? Or simply do a script-build mass rebuild
> > > > > of EPEL5 with increased %release?
> > > >
> > > > Script release bump works for me.
> > >
> > > Works for me as well. Please very clearly communicate what you are going
> > > to be doing in a new thread once it has been decided.
> >
> > Doesn't work that well for me, since I use a lot of identical spec
> > files across distros and releases. Could work if the devel branches
> > of my packages were also bumped, as otherwise the next devel update I
> > would then "backport" to EL5 would be an invalid build (same EVR as
> > the bumped rebuild).
> >
> > Matthias
> 
> rebuild would happen with  a .1 appended to your next build will be ok  

OK, if it's not "increased %release" (as it was written), but a ".1"
appended to the release, then it does also work for me :-)

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6
Load : 11.40 11.98 10.89


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]