[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Updates from knurd (was: Re: Topics for tomorrows (20080116) EPEL SIG meeting)



On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 15.01.2008 19:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | next testing -> stable move | knurd |
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/NextTestingStableMove
>
> Working on the next move for EPEL4 right now.
>
> > /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | EL-updates to the buildsys | mmcgrath |
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc
>
> from
> https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/327
>
> "rhel4 i386 and x86_64 are synced down and will resync every day. ppc is
> going to be, umm, suffering until I figure out how to make the systemid
> work. I'll play some more and see what I can do."
>
> mmcgrath, current status?
I believe its been worked out

> > /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | KojiAndBodhiForEpel | mmcgrath |
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/KojiAndBodhiForEpel
>
> Some movements in
> https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/koji/ticket/49
>
> > /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | permission to use spec files in other projects
> >
> > | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc
>
> Does anybody still care? Seems the Board either do not understand what
> we/I'm up to or they ignore it.

No one but you sees a problem.  It's covered by the CLA.  if you want to be 
more explicit then you are free to put a license header in each of your 
specs. Documenting the wiki would be ok and point at a copy of the CLA should 
more than suffice.

> > /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | broken dep reports go to the list |
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc
>
> Some work from mschwendt; who is in charge for the current dep checker
> script? Does it sill work? Should we switch to the one from mschwendt
> (the old one from Extras)?
>
> > /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | Free discussion around EPEL
>
>  * Anybody willing to file bugs for the remaining broken deps (the
> report got send to the lis a few days ago)?
>
>  * FUDCon report anyone? Or wasn't EPEL discussed there?
>
> Cu
> knurd
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]