Are we building against CentOS 5.2 or 5.1

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> 2008/7/16 Martin Sourada <martin.sourada at gmail.com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just got a bug on gxine about missing dependency on gecko-libs =
> > 1.8.0.12 and after some exploration I've found that Firefox was upgraded
> > to 3.0 in CentOS 5.2 and that CentOS 5.2 was released about three weeks
> > ago, but I didn't noticed any message, or warning, here on the
> > epel-devel-list. So the question is, are the builders set to build
> > against 5.1 or against 5.2?

> We actually build against RHEL.  I think the builders are still at
> 5.1, if I am recalling correctly.
>
> Anybody else ?

The should be using RHEL-5.2  now if not file a bug and we will get it fixed

-- 
Dennis Gilmore

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20080716/5aed2fb0/attachment.sig>