[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: pexepct is in RHEL and should be dropped from EPEL

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:

Red Hat GSS obviously takes advantage with EPEL, as they can often just grab a package from EPEL X to be included in RHEL X.Y+1 whenever they feel like it. I'm pretty sure they put enough QA effort in on such package, but meanwhile they do not even bother to notify the current EPEL maintainer(s).

You are blaming the wrong people. GSS is just support people. They don't involve themselves with maintaining packages or QA.

Again, you only point out the wrong, not the right. Whoever it is or whatever the department is called, it's @redhat.com. GSS has the most benefit from getting it right, because they answer the phone when a customer is confused having packages from EPEL that are in RHEL. I think the message I wanted to send out was clear enough on it's own, regardless of getting all the acronyms and departments right.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]