[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Repository Tagging, why don't we do it?



On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Bryan J Smith<bjs redhat com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Adam Miller<maxamillion gmail com>
> wrote:
>> Sorry to all parties involved if I have brought up old cruft that
>> should have been left to the grave but I wasn't aware and was just
>> seeking an answer. Thanks to dgilmore for pointing me to the archives,
>> I found the thread and read through it.
>
> On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 16:07 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> Its ok... its going to be asked every 6 months no matter what. It is
>> one of those things that caused a lot of wounds that seem to have
>> stayed festering. There are technical reasons people wanted it and
>> there were emotional/psychological reasons (eg identity) people wanted
>> it. And there were similar reasons 'against' it. In the end one side
>> got chosen and that's pretty much it.
>
> We should probably consider sending out a monthly FAQ with the monthly
> subscription info, things that answer these type of FAQs.
>
We should make an FAQ first :)


stahnma

>
> --
> Bryan J Smith     Senior Consultant    Red Hat GPS SE US
> mailto:bjs redhat com         +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile)
> mailto:b j smith ieee org     (non-RH/ext to Blackberry)
> --------------------------------------------------------
> You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100%
> no-IP-strings-attached, community software development.
> But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other
> software and services firms for their own, direct needs?
> It's no comparison:  http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]