building kernel module for disabled module?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:52:03 -0400
Adam Goode <adam at spicenitz.org> wrote:

> Hi,
...snip...
> Is there anything sufficiently wrong with doing this?

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Policy

"kernel-modules further are not allowed, as they can disturb the base
kernel easily."

If you can talk the RHEL folks into adding the coda module, the
userspace part would be great for EPEL. 

> Thanks,
> 
> Adam

kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20090908/98fa4faa/attachment.sig>