"newer packages"

[Karsten Wade]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:16:58PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

> This would be a totally seperate 'epel-bleeding' or
> 'epel-newer-versions' repo? 

If we did this, we would be best served with an entirely new
brand/name.

Aside from the challenges of Eh-pull/Ee-pull and acronyms in general,
there is also a brand expectation around EPEL.

EPEL is the stable, stolid, same-old-you-can-rely-upon moving at the
pace of RHEL itself.

An exciting, new, updated parallel/conflicting package set should have
a new name and identity.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20090909/64fc679c/attachment.sig>