[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: conflicts fedora-release



On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge gmail com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 15:01, seth vidal <skvidal fedoraproject org> wrote:
>> Completely ridiculous but this is the 2nd time in a couple of weeks I've
>> seen this happen.
>>
>> Apparently new users are installing epel as a repo onto fedora...
>>
>> I assume they are doing by installing epel-release which is kinda
>> special.
>>
>> nevertheless - how painful/bad would it be if we added a 'Conflicts:
>> fedora-release' to the epel-release spec?
>
> Oh I was going to say
>
> Obsoletes: Fedora
>
> or
>
> ExcludeOS: Fedora
>
> but no that does sound like a good idea.
>
>> -sv
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> epel-devel-list mailing list
>> epel-devel-list redhat com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> “The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.”
> Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
> "We have a strategic plan. It's called doing things.""
> — Herb Kelleher, founder Southwest Airlines
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>
Should be easy enough.  I can make the edit and push a new one.

stahnma


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]