[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel



On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Adam Miller
<maxamillion fedoraproject org> wrote:
> As the subject notes, nagios is in fact shipped by RedHat.
>
.....
> The reason I wanted to bring this up is that we say in our policy that
> we do not ship packages that are shipped by RedHat in RHEL. But this
> being a subscription channel that is not extremely popular, do we want
> to revise that policy to say that we don't ship packages that are not
> in the base channel of desktop/workstation/server/ap as those are the
> most common or do we want to stick to the current policy quite
> strictly?

As I understood it.. it was only for the base RHEL channels. Channels
which are not available from a base subscription were not considered
covered by our policy.


> Just food for thought, it was a topic of conversation in #rhel today.
>
> -AdamM
>
> --
> http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
> /\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]