[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel



On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge gmail com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:21 PM, inode0 <inode0 gmail com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge gmail com> wrote:
>>> "EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace
>>> packages in RHEL or layered products."
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>> "EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace
>>> packages in RHEL. [Package conflicts are determined by what is openly
>>> available from Red Hat's tree (currently located at
>>> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/) ]
>>
>> I would appreciate you putting up with one more serious question from
>> the perspective of a user. Since RHEIPA, RHSAT, RHDirServ, RHCERT,
>> RHWAS, and more fall into this new category and since the upstream
>> versions of many of those have been suggested as desirable targets for
>> inclusion in EPEL can you help me understand what a package conflict
>> means in this case? Is it a conflict at the package level? Is it a
>> conflict at the file level?
>
> I am not sure what you mean fall into this new category. None of the
> channels listed above seem to be in
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/ [Nor are some of
> them on ftp://ftp.redhat.com/ in a form that could be used to build
> file/package conflicts from.]
>
> Could you define it a bit better for me?

You need to drill down a bit to see them.

ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/

John


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]