[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Packages duplicated between EL-5 sub-channels and EPEL



Once upon a time, Rich Megginson <rmeggins redhat com> said:
> Perhaps we should have a "base" EPEL channel and "layered" channels on 
> top?

The problem with that is that you would need something like:

epel-base: packages that don't conflict with any known RH channels
epel-not-ds: packages that don't conflict with RH DS channel
epel-not-sat: packages that don't conflict with RH Satellite channel
...

I don't know how you'd manage that (especially if you had a server
subscribed to multiple RH channels).

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]