Summary/Minutes from todays EPEL meeting - 2010-01-15

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:10:23 +0100
Till Maas <opensource at till.name> wrote:

> Please explain from which repos RHEL-AP is composed for both RHEL 4
> and 5. Maybe I am really the only maintaining packages in EPEL, but I
> do only know kind of how CentoOS works and is splitted in
> Repositories. But they use RHEL AS afaics, so their package set
> already seems to differ.

I'm not 100% sure here now that I think about it. 
(I am also mainly a centos user). 

I think this is everything thats produced from: 
(for 5):

/pub/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client
/pub/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/

(for 4):
/pub/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/os

Can someone with more understanding of RHEL channels confirm that? 

> Also the mock config should probably be configured to use only the
> packages from CentOS that are supposed to exist in BuildRoots for
> EPEL.

I think thats the case, as CentOS base uses this same set. 
(At least that was my understanding). 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20100118/33b4aa0c/attachment.sig>