[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: EPEL test mass rebuild results



On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:47:15PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:05 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On 07/07/10 21:59, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 02:47:26PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > >> Wow thats a lot of packages. I need to get a build system like that at
> > >> home :). For me personally it will be interesting to see why alpine
> > >> fails to build. On the other hand it is nice that so much of F12 can
> > >> be built on it. [Me I want to do this experiment with
> > >> EPEL-4/EPEL-5/EPEL-6 and F-X :) but I am a completist.]
> > >
> > > here's the alpine log.  Looks like the perl-version package got built,
> > > and started getting pulled in, but conflicts.
> > 
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597982
> > 
> > Paul.
> 
> I'm seeing 3 package failures (icewm, idesk and gmrun) due to the perl
> error.
> Any change of redoing the build once it is fixed?

Conceivable, yes, though my builds aren't being done in koji, and
aren't tagged in CVS - it's just a "back of the envelope" view of
what's possible.

-- 
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist
Dell | Office of the CTO


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]