On Wednesday, July 21, 2010 08:39:56 am Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > On 07/20/2010 10:49 AM, Mark Chappell wrote: > > perl-Email-Date-Format, > > mark as dead > > > cairomm and wordnet appear to be in all arches > > for beta 2 and should probably be removed from EPEL-6 > > > > > > perl-HTML-Format, > > 2.04-11.1.el6, 2.04-13 > > > perl-Class-Data-Inheritable, > > 0.08-3.1.el6, 0.08-5 > > > perl-Class-Trigger, > > 0.13-2.1.el6, 0.14-2 > > > perl-Font-AFM, > > 1.20-3.1.el6, 1.20-5 > > > perl-PadWalker, > > 1.9-1.el6, 1.9-1 > > > perl-File-Copy-Recursive > > 0.38-4.el6, 0.38-1 > > > and libart_lgpl > > > > appear to be newer versions in EPEL than in RHEL-6 beta 2, please could > > you rebuild using the SRPMs available from the RedHat repositories > > available at ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/5.90Server > > > > > > > > Mark > > IMHO only perl-Class-Trigger has different version, but EL-5 < RHEL-6 > and RHEL-6 < EL-6. > > Could you point me to some guidelines about NVRs in EPEL? I suppose > there is no rule, which say that RHEL-6.0 must have bigger NVRs than EL-6. There is no supported upgrade path i know of from rhel5 to rhel6 without reinstalling. If Red Hat ships a version in optional on one arch thats less than the el-5 version we still must use the rhel5 version for the other arches Dennis
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.