[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: clamav (again)

First of all, I appreciate the work.

I prefer to install the empty db package, and have freshclam download the initial database.  I didn't see a db-empty package in your spec file.  I had some issues where after updating clamav, freshclam named the updated db files differently than came in the db package, and I ended up with clam complaining about having two databases.

My take from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573191 was to add --disable-llvm to the build for EL5, since AFAIK the EL5 SELinux package doesn't have the clamd_use_jit boolean (I haven't checked 5.6).


On 2/14/2011 5:18 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

Last week at the epel meeting we talked about clamav and getting it
updated and maintained better. One of the issues that came up is that
folks would prefer a more understandable spec. That would help maintain
and keep it updated better. 

Toward that end I have: 


This is a package based on Dag's package from a while back and updated
for Fedora guidelines, etc. 

In some simple testing on epel5 and epel6 it works pretty well. It
upgrades the existing packages ok, with one exception: You need to
'mv /etc/freshclam.conf.rpmnew /etc/freshclam.conf' in order to get
freshclam happy. I'm not sure of a way around this, but if anyone has
one, I'd love to hear it. 

I mailed the EPEL maintainers of clamav last week and got one reply
saying the spec seemed fine, but nothing back from the other
co-maintainers. I'd like to set a time (say a week from now?) where we
just commit this new spec and push out updates for testing. 

Thoughts? Comments? Flames? 

_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list redhat com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]