[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: xrootd-devel and missing header files

Hi Christina,

No, this was the right list. Unfortunately, we don't control the fedora packaging (I didn't even know they were creating a separate package). They should include all include files if they are going to include any simply because I don't think they figure out the dependencies. At least that would be my take.


On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Steve Traylen wrote:

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Cristina Aiftimiei <caifti gmail com>wrote:

Dear all,

I apologies if it's the wrong place for making such questions. Please let
me know if I have to contact somone else or in a different matter.

Hi Christina,

Best is to submit a bug to redhat's bugzilla, you can take a short cut to
correct page using the link on this page:


I'm fairly sure you have to register with Redhat's bugzilla once there.

Our project is starting to make intensive use of EPEL packages, so our
developers are trying to adapt their software to what is provided in the
EPEL repository.


In the last days one of our groups need the:

- XrdCms/XrdCmsReq.hh.
- XrdCms/XrdCmsXmiReq.hh

That said the files are here:


but this may still be a bug of course due to your comment below.

file and those files are not provided by the xrootd-devel package (
as expected by the developers.
More than this the xrootd-devl il providing the XrdCms/XrdCmsXmi.hh that
#include "XrdCms/XrdCmsReq.hh"

that means including a file that doesn't exist, or at least I'm seeing it
like this, sorry if I'm wrong.

Is there a reason that those headers are missing from the xrootd-devl, and
is there a way to include them?

Thank you very much,

epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list redhat com

Steve Traylen

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]