[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Major version upgrades - acceptable if in number only?



On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:04:18PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 20 January 2012 11:12, Russell Golden <niveusluna www niveusluna org> wrote:
> > I maintain mozilla-https-everywhere, and upstream is going to release
> > version 2.0 soon. I hope. Anyway. If 2.0's only changes are new
> > supported sites, would it be acceptable to push it to EPEL, or should
> > I just use the repo I already have on repos.fedorapeople.org? If
> > indeed the only change is new rulesets, backporting would make the
> > resulting package 1.x in name only.
> 
> I think this would be ok.
> 
+1

Attachment: pgpXx9ENZbVpG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]