[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

2.2.19: Assertion failure in ext3_new_block() at balloc.c line 709

Red Hat 2.2.19-6.2.12
+ 0.0.7a
+ https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2001-November/002258.html
(not tuned in /proc yet)
+ journal 4MB on each fs
+ 6 ext3 fs on raid1 (hda+hdc)
+ 1 ext3 fs on another disk not on raid1 (hdd)

While untarring (tar zxf) a file that was on a ext3/raid1 onto hdd I got:

ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.2.19-6.2.12.g1.  Options used
     -V (default)
     -k /proc/ksyms (default)
     -l /proc/modules (default)
     -o /lib/modules/2.2.19-6.2.12.g1/ (default)
     -m /boot/System.map-2.2.19-6.2.12.g1 (specified)
Warning (compare_ksyms_lsmod): module iBCS is in lsmod but not in ksyms,
probably no symbols exported
Warning (compare_ksyms_lsmod): module printer is in lsmod but not in ksyms,
probably no symbols exported
Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol module_list_R__ver_module_list not
found in System.map.  Ignoring ksyms_base entry
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
current->tss.cr3 = 010e8000, %cr3 = 010e8000
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0002
CPU:    0
EIP:    0010:[<c0146885>]
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
EFLAGS: 00010282
eax: 0000006d   ebx: 00000400   ecx: 00000019   edx: 00000022
esi: c0b78a00   edi: c3365000   ebp: c2cd0380   esp: c0c93e28
ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
Process tar (pid: 5855, process nr: 102, stackpage=c0c93000)
Stack: c01f2fff 000002c5 c01f3220 c1dae990 00018001 c1dae990 c1daea40
       c2198cc0 c2e2ac80 c3eaa700 00018000 c0c93e74 c0c92000 c2539c00
       00000005 0000000c c222b5a0 c25b4420 c0149314 c2198cc0 c1dae990
Call Trace: [<c01f2fff>] [<c01f3220>] [<c0149314>] [<c0149636>] [<c0148bbf>]
0149b27>] [<c0149ccc>]
       [<c014bb4b>] [<c012ee8f>] [<c012f57d>] [<c010a06c>] [<c010002b>]
Code: c6 05 00 00 00 00 00 83 c4 14 90 b8 0d 00 00 00 0f b3 45 18
>>EIP; c0146885 <ext3_new_block+635/738>   <=====
Trace; c01f2fff <cprt+2a1f/a240>
Trace; c01f3220 <cprt+2c40/a240>
Trace; c0149314 <ext3_alloc_block+30/38>
Trace; c0149636 <inode_getblk+d2/20c>
Trace; c0148bbf <ext3_new_inode+6ef/7ac>
Trace; c0149b27 <ext3_getblk+c7/244>
Trace; c0149ccc <ext3_bread+28/118>
Trace; c014bb4b <ext3_mkdir+117/634>
Trace; c012ee8f <lookup_dentry+15f/1e8>
Trace; c012f57d <sys_mkdir+e1/11c>
Trace; c010a06c <system_call+34/38>
Trace; c010002b <startup_32+2b/11e>
Code;  c0146885 <ext3_new_block+635/738>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code;  c0146885 <ext3_new_block+635/738>   <=====
   0:   c6 05 00 00 00 00 00      movb   $0x0,0x0   <=====
Code;  c014688c <ext3_new_block+63c/738>
   7:   83 c4 14                  addl   $0x14,%esp
Code;  c014688f <ext3_new_block+63f/738>
   a:   90                        nop
Code;  c0146890 <ext3_new_block+640/738>
   b:   b8 0d 00 00 00            movl   $0xd,%eax
Code;  c0146895 <ext3_new_block+645/738>
  10:   0f b3 45 18               btrl   %eax,0x18(%ebp)
3 warnings issued.  Results may not be reliable.

This looks similar to

No fs was over 70% full

giulioo pobox com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]