[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: ext3 patch for 2.4.6 (plain or ac1)



Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> 
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > OK, thanks.  Best to wait for 0.9.0 in that case.
> 
> 0.9.0 or 0.0.9 ?

That was a subliminal message.  I'd like to multiply the
numbering scheme by ten, so if we need to fix bugs against
0.9.0, we can issue 0.9.1.  At present, we'd have to call
it 0.0.9.something-new.

> Please don't break CVS before Friday 06:00
> GMT, when I'll cvs update...

Shouldn't be a problem.

> BTW, what happened to the versioning scheme that'd be used by
> ext3 - 1.0 for 2.2 and 1.1 for 2.4. Am I missing something ?

I've been using `ext3-2.4-x.y.z' to distinguish it from the
2.2 patch.





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]