[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: LVM 0.9.1beta7 and ext3 0.0.6b



> On Tue, 8 May 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
>
> > Did this ever happen before 0.0.6?  The new dirty buffer handling code
> > could well be relevant here, as ext3 now keeps its dirty state
> > separate and so a journaled buffer is no longer necessarily going to
> > look dirty to invalidate_buffers().
>
> I haven't check with 0.0.5.x to see.  I can add this to my todo list
> though.:)

Stephen, to answer your prior question above, I tried this with LVM
0.9.1beta7 and ext3 0.0.5c to verify if the problem is only related to
0.0.6b.  It still exhibits the same "Attempt to refile free buffer" caused
by __invalidate_buffers().





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]