[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: FSCK?



Hehe, well that's reassuring! :)

So does someone else suggest that I try going down to 2.4.9?!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext3-users-admin redhat com 
> [mailto:ext3-users-admin redhat com] On Behalf Of Theodore Tso
> Sent: October 20, 2001 11:59 PM
> To: David GXmez
> Cc: Andrew Morton; Statux; Jason A. Lixfeld; ext3-users redhat com
> Subject: Re: FSCK?
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 04:13:33PM +0200, David GXmez wrote:
> > 
> > LVM is not the cause of the problem. I also had the same problem: a 
> > fsck on an ext3 partition, lots of errors, and next time the only 
> > thing that left on the partition was a lost+found directory 
> with the 
> > remains of what was my ext3 filesystem.
> > 
> > I was using 2.4.10 when this happened, maybe is this the problem? 
> > Jason?
> > 
> 
> Using 2.4.10 is almost certainly a bad move, and probably was 
> responsible for your lossage.  Quite frankly, at the moment 
> all of my production machines are running 2.4.9 with ext3, 
> and it's quite stable; I'm not sure I trust any of the more 
> recent kernels at this point (due the VM code, not the ext3 
> code).  Of course, I don't trust the LVM code at all, 
> regardless of kernel version, but that probably has something 
> to do with the fact that when I looked at the code, I wasn't 
> impressed by the overall code quality....
> 
> 							- Ted
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ext3-users mailing list
> Ext3-users redhat com 
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ex> t3-users
> 






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]