[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: ext3 badness in 2.6.0-test2



On Friday August 8, mfedyk matchmail com wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 10:39:43AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> > -		sh = get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, pd_idx, (bi->bi_rw&RWA_MASK));
> > +		sh = get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, pd_idx, 0/*(bi->bi_rw&RWA_MASK)*/);
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to remove instead of just commenting out that
> part?

Thew ugliness (hopefuly) reminds me to fix it properly.
I think I can come up with a sensible use for the read-ahead flag, but
I would want to think carefully about it first, and test it somewhat.

NeilBrown




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]