From: ext3-users-bounces redhat com [mailto:ext3-users-
bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Ric Wheeler
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:08 AM
To: Richard Hipp
Cc: ext3-users redhat com
Subject: Re: SQLite and ext3 journalling mode
On 12/08/2010 11:56 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Ric Wheeler<ricwheeler gmail com
<mailto:ricwheeler gmail com>> wrote:
On 12/08/2010 06:52 AM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
Thanks. But to be clear, is data=ordered better than
wrt. data integrity following a power failure?
Data integrity can mean a couple of different things.
If you are file system meta-data centric (i.e., a file system
just worried about having to run fsck after a crash to repair the
system), then both options *should* be equivalent.
If you are one of those annoying users who define data integrity
include those annoying details like will my file have garbage in
a crash that will make my DB or other app puke, then data ordered
clearly more robust.
Thanks, Ric. Yes, we are numbered among the "annoying users". Based
you are telling us, we'll recommend that people use data=ordered,