[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: 2**31-1 blocks question



Mag Gam wrote:
> We need to create very large filesystems. We prefer to have a
> filesystem which is 12TB but it seems ext3 does not suppor that.

Most recent ext3 kernelspace and userspace should technically
make it to 16T.

> Everytime, we do mkfs.ext3 on a 12TB LV we get
> 
> mke2fs: Filesystem too large.  No more than 2**31-1 blocks
> 
>          (8TB using a blocksize of 4K) are currently supported.

Newer e2fsprogs should have lifted this restriction.
Note however that a filesystem this large will probably be almost
impossible - at least very slow - to run fsck on.

> 
> We can override that by doing,
> 
> mkfs.ext3 -b 8192
> 
> But what is the downside for doing this? By using a larger blocksize
> what are the consequences?

The downside is you probably can't mount it, because it's 
block size > page size on most architectures (like x86 and x86_64)

-Eric

> _______________________________________________
> Ext3-users mailing list
> Ext3-users redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]