[fab] project hosting?
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Thu Apr 20 17:12:11 UTC 2006
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bill Nottingham (notting at redhat.com) said:
>> Rahul Sundaram (sundaram at fedoraproject.org) said:
>>> It is far from clear to me why Fedora needs to provide its own
>>> infrastructure for itself rather than just use something like Savannah.
>> Integrating the translation project into Savannah seems like
>> it would be hard, if not impossible.
>
> Addtional points that would be problematic:
>
> Savannah project musts:
> * Use a license compatible with the GNU GPL;
Any current/potential problems with this?
> * Refer to the GNU/Linux operating system instead of the Linux,
> which is the kernel. Advertise the free software movements,
> which we support, and not the open source one, which we don't.
The blurb about GNU/Linux I found said:
*... please acknowledge our work, by referring to this system as
'GNU/Linux', when you mention it in connection with this package
(savannah)."
I have no problem with that (and besides, they asked politely).
> * Do not use "Open" in your project name.
Not a problem.
-- Rex
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list