[fab] project hosting?

[Karsten Wade]

On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 12:12 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Bill Nottingham (notting at redhat.com) said: 
> >> Rahul Sundaram (sundaram at fedoraproject.org) said: 
> >>> It is far from clear to me why Fedora needs to provide its own
> >>> infrastructure for itself rather than just use something like Savannah.
> >> Integrating the translation project into Savannah seems like
> >> it would be hard, if not impossible.
> > 
> > Addtional points that would be problematic:
> > 
> > Savannah project musts:
> > * Use a license compatible with the GNU GPL;
> 
> Any current/potential problems with this?

Is the OPL compatible with the GNU GPL?

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE *    Sr. Editor   * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
Fedora Documentation Project http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject

Learn. Network. Experience open source.
Red Hat Summit Nashville  |  May 30 - June 2, 2006
Learn more: http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060420/dbcec9fb/attachment.sig>