[fab] Fedora Logo Proposal

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 19:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Greg DeKoenigsberg (gdk at redhat.com) said: 
> > Anyway, that's the proposal.  If you have an objection, please be as 
> > specific as you can possibly be.  We want to take action on this soon.
> 
> How would these terms relate to Diana's and Máirín's gimp/photo stuff? It's 
> neither schwag, nor website, nor a distribution itself. Does this fall under
> 'things approved by Fedora Art'?

Darn it, I meant to write something about this in my last reply too.  We
need to address the licensing issue for this stuff too in the acceptable
use policy.  Perhaps we could make the acceptance hinge on the licensing
for the art?

I think everyone would probably agree that any Creative Commons "NC" is
not free enough (probably "ND" as well), but what about "BY" and/or
"SA"?  Are there other licenses that work well for art?

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060807/f3dc5f11/attachment.sig>