[fab] speaking of bad bugzilla behavior...

[Karsten Wade]

On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 09:36 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote:

> And it's a great example of why not having the community participate 
> directly means small shit like that goes unfixed.  Could have been easy 
> as a quick review.

+1

People employed at Red Hat may be paid to work on Fedora (well, not me,
but some of us :), but that doesn't mean we are immune to overwork,
stress, and poor reactions.

Fixing the people involved is a short-term solution.  Making them have
less pain is better for the mid-term, at least.

Less anyone think I am condoning bad behavior, I am not.  I am just
saying it is inevitable in situations like this.  Changing the situation
yields the best results.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060819/61de59eb/attachment.sig>