[fab] dealing with rpm.
seth vidal
skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Wed Aug 23 20:25:51 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 01:53 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
>
> >>> what do y'all think?
> >> +1. Wouldnt reviving rpm.org be better than finding another place though?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > rpm.org is on red hat servers.
> >
> > neutral, to me, means an exec at any one company can't order it taken
> > offline. :)
> >
>
> Ok. I dont think thats really a big issue. I havent heard anyone ever
> accused Red Hat of controlling GNOME just because gnome.org is hosted by
> Red Hat (on probably the same server as rpm.org even). If thats really a
> concern,move rpm.org hosting to some other place then instead of
> creating a new project place.
>
> My point is rpm.org is the natural place most people are going to look
> when filing bugs, looking to discuss spec issues, documentation etc.
>
fair enough.
some minor items:
linux.duke.edu has cvs repos and bugzilla already running if it is any
use to anyone.
so then 'upstream' rpm would actually have an upstream place to do that
stuff.
-sv
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list