[fab] dealing with rpm.

seth vidal skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Wed Aug 23 20:25:51 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 01:53 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> 
> >>> what do y'all think?
> >> +1. Wouldnt reviving rpm.org be better than finding another place though?
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > rpm.org is on red hat servers.
> > 
> > neutral, to me, means an exec at any one company can't order it taken
> > offline. :)
> > 
> 
> Ok. I dont think thats really a big issue. I havent heard anyone ever 
> accused Red Hat of controlling GNOME just because gnome.org is hosted by 
> Red Hat (on probably the same server as rpm.org even). If thats really a 
> concern,move rpm.org hosting to some other place then instead of 
> creating a new project place.
> 
> My point is rpm.org is the natural place most people are going to look 
> when filing bugs, looking to discuss spec issues, documentation etc.
> 

fair enough.

some minor items:

linux.duke.edu has cvs repos and bugzilla already running if it is any
use to anyone.

so then 'upstream' rpm would actually have an upstream place to do that
stuff.

-sv





More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list