mailing-list reorganisation
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Wed Dec 13 19:38:05 UTC 2006
Dennis Gilmore (dennis at ausil.us) said:
> fedora-advisory-board
> fedora-advisory-board-readonly
> fedora-board-list
> Should we merge the board-list to fab list?
No.
> fedora-announce-list
> Fedora-maintainers-announce
> Fedora-directory-announce
> Fedora-legacy-announce
> Lets merge all the announge lists to one. If need be people can filter
I have no idea what maintainers-announce is for, but it's unlikely
that it's the same purpose as fedora-announce.
> fedora-devel-list
> fedora-devel-java-list
> Fedora-perl-devel-list
> Fedora-r-devel-list
> Fedora-directory-devel
> fedora-test-list
> fedora-extras-list
> Fedora-relnotes-content
> Fedora-packaging
> merge all the devel lists into one
Why? Shouldn't separate SIGs, such as perl or java, have their own
list? Moreover, the directory server list is the *upstream* development
list - it shouldn't be merged.
> fedora-cvs-commits
> fedora-extras-commits
> Fedora-eclipse-commits
> Fedora-directory-commits
> lets merge all cvs commits to one list. i can always filter ones i dont want
> out.
Again, you want to separate upstream lists (directory) from Fedora
lists.
> Fedora-trans-ar
> Fedora-trans-bn
> Fedora-trans-bn_in
> Fedora-trans-el
> Fedora-trans-hi
> Fedora-trans-ja
> Fedora-trans-list
> Fedora-i18n-list
> Do we really need a translation list and a i18n list?
One is i18n, one is l10n.
Bill
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list