fedora 7 schedule (was Re: Fedora 7 planing)
Dave Jones
davej at redhat.com
Wed Dec 13 21:42:37 UTC 2006
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:26:46PM -0500, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> But wrt this particular issue, I see it largely as a question of
> support. Talking with Brian Stevens, Stein and Tim B they brought up
> the suggestion of breaking it out into its own rpm and making it Red
> Hat's responsibility - not yours. Keep things moving and if supporting
> Xen is really important then these guys will step up to the plate and
> carry it themselves.
That does seem sensible. In fact, at one stage, we *did* do things this way.
There was a separate kernel-xen package, and I never had to worry about it.
Concerns grew however about fixes going into one kernel package but not
the other.
> They certainly can't make it _your_ problem without backing you with the
> proper resources to handle it.
I'd have loved to have heard that 18 months ago.
We might fix this issue, but I want to be sure it doesn't happen again.
When the next "must have" half-baked not-upstream feature comes along,
I'm seriously going to be pushing back a lot harder than I have done in the past.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list