[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: fedora 7 schedule (was Re: Fedora 7 planing)



On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:07:47PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
 > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:44, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
 > > Sounds fine to me.  But just make sure it's "I don't have the bandwith
 > > to do this, you're going to have to help me" not "Xen sucks, get it
 > > out."  Xen _might_ suck because it's not upstream, but I don't think
 > > that's the problem we're really dealing with here.  Just a guess, though.
 > 
 > Its more of a 'xen upstream doesn't care about newer kernels nor Fedora, so we 
 > have to do all the work ourselves, and um -ENOTIME'  However if the xen stuff 
 > were in upstream kernel, there is a much higher chance it would be working 
 > before the upstream kernel made upstream releases and then we wouldn't have 
 > this problem.

Right. It's a bottleneck. I'm prevented from rebasing until the Xen team
has found the cycles to bring the necessary bits up to speed.
When this happens basically I have to go find something else to do.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]