Fedora release lifecyle

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 22:35 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 16:42 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Look, lets be honest here.  Fedora isn't all that great of a distro for a 
> > stable server.  We don't do backports, we play with new technology, we've got 
> > a fast paced development cycle, etc...  Lets not try to be something we 
> > aren't.
> 
> Actually I find that ideal for a mail server. I _want_ to keep Exim,
> SpamAssassin and ClamAV up to date. All my servers run Fedora.

As do mine.  Fedora as a server is fine for quite a few people and use
cases.

josh