F7 Plan (draft)
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Wed Dec 20 02:52:58 UTC 2006
Rahul Sundaram (sundaram at fedoraproject.org) said:
> I think it is feasible to have both the GNOME and KDE variants fit into
> single CD's even with openoffice.org. There are even several Fedora
> based ones at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DerivedDistributions/
On a live CD, with trimmed packages? Yes.
On a CD of packages, *with langpacks*? No. It just does not fit - it's
719MB.
> >Burn a DVD set of the tree itself, ship it somewhere to "seed" the mirror,
> >go from there.
>
> I suspect it is far more easier to having it part of the formal releases
> . It is just a dump of all packages. Since we are going to move away
> from a rolling release model even for the current Fedora Extras, this
> shouldnt require much more additional work.
The issue is that what sort of defaults do you use - the desktop?
The server? Do you really want to a third set of integration?
> >Alternative kernels == doom. Its going to be bad enough if we have to do
> >a standalone xen kernel that moves at a different pace than the other
> >kernels. kmods blow up. Userland changes become harder to make.
> >Security flaws...
>
> We do already have alternative kernels like the one for Xen. Real time
> is just going to another one on top.
But Xen is a large maintenance headache. RT adds on to this, *while
changing core kernel code*. I'm hereby withdrawing this as a feature. :)
Bill
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list