[fab] Fw: [Bug 174307] RPM 4.4.6 is available

[Jesse Keating]

On Sunday 09 July 2006 13:34, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> Then we need to have the sack to say "we're forking RPM," and take the
> abuse that comes with it.  Because this half-assed selective uptake stuff
> is just making us look bad.
>
> So is Fedora the tail that wags the dog here?  Do we just Take The
> Decision, or do we try to figure out why RH engineering is unwilling to
> take a public stance first?

If I'm not mistaken, the Fedora Board was discussing this very issue on 
Friday.  I overheard as much.  I do not know what decisions were made, if 
any, perhaps it would be time to get a report from the board regarding this.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060709/9d1e2dd0/attachment.sig>