[fab] Fedora wallpapers and legal reuse of mark

[Rahul]

Karsten Wade wrote:

> 
> We're a little jammed, though, in that there is not a good enough art
> license.  The OPL is book specific, although perhaps if we put the
> reference paragraph in the image metadata itself?
> 
> I'm glad we don't maintain our own OSI-compliant license, like everyone
> else does when they get in this jam.  Can we work with Creative Commons
> to get the warranty provision resolved, or have them create a new
> license, CC-BY-SA-NW (no warranty)?
> 
> - Karsten

This is exactly what I suggested when the OPL relicensing of Fedora Docs 
  policy was being discussed earlier. We really should fix the warranty 
issue with Creative Commons. We have a good relationship with them already.

Rahul