time for a "Fedora Core Steering Committee"? (was Re: [fab] Fw: [Bug 174307] RPM 4.4.6 is available)

[Jesse Keating]

On Monday 10 July 2006 12:33, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> In other words: Maybe it's time for a "Fedora Core Steering Committee"
> that operates similar to FESCo? E.g. regular and public IRC meetings
> (where things like this RPM sage can be brought up and discussed),
> Meeting summaries, discussions on a public list (maybe it needs to be
> operate similar to FAB, e.g. invite only and a readonly archive for the
> public?) ...? It would be okay for me if only Red Hat people are on the
> "Fedora Core Steering Committee" for now until Extras and Core get
> closer together, but such a Committee would be start into the right
> direction IMHO.
>
> Just my 2 cent. And yes, I suspect some Core developers won't like that
> idea very much because it's probably a lot more operation overhead...

This might not be a bad idea.  In the past, the Fedora Board (under whatever 
name) was also the Core board.  Now that Fedora is much larger, it does make 
sense to have a Core board that deals directly with Core, while the Fedora 
board deals with the project as a whole and issues escalated to it from the 
various subprojects.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060710/65509653/attachment.sig>