[fab] FSF Requirements for srpm provisions

Josh Boyer jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Thu Nov 2 21:34:54 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 15:44 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 11:32, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > I'd prefer they have their own SRPMS, especially if they had to pull
> > anything from -devel (which will get obsoleted from the download
> > site soon.)
> >
> > Now, if they just want one big source ISO, that's fine.
> 
> What about the Fedora project case going forward?  A spin of Fedora being of 
> both Core and Extras packages, user chosen (or in some cases project chosen) 
> package set.  Does EACH spin have to ship the SRPMS used, or can all refer 
> back to the SRPM pool at fedoraproject.org and its mirrors?

If you hose those off of fedoraproject.org (thereby making them official
Fedora projects) then the problem would be solved.

josh




More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list