[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [fab] FSF Requirements for srpm provisions



On Thursday 02 November 2006 15:50, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> As long as the SRPMs remain available.  If the respin involves packages
> where we don't keep the RPMS/SRPMS for the life of the ISO respin then
> we'd be in trouble.
>
> I know this would cause trouble for things from FC-devel.  I think it
> would be a problem for FC-updates and FE as well.
>

Don't forget CVS.  It's just as valid as a source provider as the SRPMS.

-- 
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64 n-man com

http://n-man.com/

LinkedIn:
http://linkedin.com/in/nman64

Have I been helpful?  Rate my assistance!
http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
-- 

Attachment: pgpJB5y8FX4M8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]