[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [fab] Architecture Policy.



On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:57 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 16 November 2006 16:48, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Jesse Keating (jkeating redhat com) said:
> > > Sure, but how can you tell?  How can you tell what somebody might have
> > > done to get from point A) source rpms to point B) binary rpms wrapped up
> > > in an iso?
> >
> > So, you'd ship a system that doesn't use the bits you use to build
> > it? Why would someone go to that much effort?
> 
> I don't know, but I just think a blanket "built from Fedora sources can be 
> Fedora" is a bit too far reaching.  "Built from Fedora sources by Fedora 
> tools" seems a bit safer to me, but still should get board approval to use 
> the logo/trademark.

How do you conclusively prove that?  You'd have to keep mock build logs
for every binary in that release for people to look at.

josh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]