[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [fab] Architecture Policy.



>>>>> "TC" == Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa redhat com> writes:

TC> I'd agree with this. PPC should be a secondary arch for a variety
TC> of reasons, none of which having to do with its code quality.

Oddly, I can't think of a really good reason why it shouldn't be a
primary arch.  Is it really that much overhead for us?  And if it is
made secondary, is there any path for it to make it back to primary
status?  What would the criteria be?

 - J<


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]