[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FESCo future



Greg Dekoenigsberg schrieb:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> But we IMHO need it for now to really set a sign to the public: "We
>> seriously want the community involved in Fedora. Thus to show our trust
>> to the community we added this rule to make sure that they wil have
>> certain influence in the central board that in the future will govern
>> what was known as Fedora Core until now".
> Why not send that signal through an open election?

I think that's not enough for now as we did quite bad with setting the
sign "we seriously want the community involved in Fedora" in the past years.

CU
thl


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]