[fab] Fedora Project and Hosting

[seth vidal]

On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:13 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:20 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> 
> > I won't say use 108 b/c:
> > 1. 108 is not open source
> 
> s/108/SourceForge/

You won't see me  arguing for sf, either. So the above point is moot.

> 
> And unlike SF, the people behind 108 (me, Red Hat, etc.) are in favor of
> a 100% FLOSS solution.  We just couldn't find one for the
> time-to-market.  Also nice to have a managed hosting provider, with that
> same time-to-market.

I think I'll believe it when I see it. We've been waiting on lots of
things that red hat has 'promised' to make open source and yet somehow
has found reasons not to release *cough* brew, distill *cough*

> Not if you already have a redhat.com account, which many people either
> have already or will want.

which is nice but I already have a fedora account. I'd prefer to use it.

-sv